jsmile
Life is good
发贴: 127
积分: 52
|
于 2003-12-20 07:44
First of all, I don't want to argue with you. I am just lost, in terms of your definition of success. Success only makes sense within certain period of time and reasonable scope. For example, there are ten holdings in one investment portfolio. The holdings could be stocks, bonds, etc… A couple stocks may lose money in a period of time but the value of portfolio may increase because the other securities perform well. And next month, the whole composite might go down. What do you think of this case, success of failure? Please don’t say that every investor is a loser.
但商業應用上卻極端需要另一套模型以帶領商業軟件工程的成功。 新模型終於出現,它以物件導向的名稱出現,以區別以前的程序導向。 A sofeware company can't make money by only depending on OOA, OOD or OOM, which is not a cure all. That's why there are CEO, CTO and CFO (They are very important).
物件模型的出現應該令軟件工程成功,但至今統計上成功率並沒有大幅增加,何以故? What kind of statistics are you based on? And what speed are you expecting?
軍事項目之成功是 ... What about Iraq?
原來軟件工程想保證成功,可以進入科研或軍事項目,Linux 與 Open Source 之類,其成功原因就是科研項目。 Who will pay the bills for me? Opne source is a success? So far, maybe.
|